Comments on: Hamels, Bullpen Hammered; Yanks Take Series Lead

By: Barry Starritt

Barry Starritt — Tue, 16 Feb 2010 21:35:35 +0000

Hi just thought i would tell you something.. This is twice now i’ve landed on your blog in the last 2 days hunting for completely unrelated things. Spooky or what?

By: Scooter

Scooter — Mon, 02 Nov 2009 01:55:43 +0000

Did your mommy write out that response for you hughy? That’s pretty lame. What’s next: I know you are but what am I? watch the game or go play your world of war craft

By: Hugh Stacks

Hugh Stacks — Mon, 02 Nov 2009 01:34:26 +0000

It makes you insecure because your putting yourself up on an imaginary pedestal because you want to believe you are more important than you actually are. It wasn’t that hard to follow.

By: Scooter

Scooter — Mon, 02 Nov 2009 00:50:28 +0000

Hugh Stacks: I’d respond further but you can’t rationalize with a bumbling fool like yourself.

By: Mike Schmidt

Mike Schmidt — Mon, 02 Nov 2009 00:18:36 +0000

The ground rule that the umps made up is inconsistent with having instant replay. The rule states that any ball hitting a camera is a home run because the umps do not control the camerman. That is only true when the umps do not have instant replay. Because the umps have instant replay their reasoning behind the ground rule is a lie and the ground rule is illegal.

By: Mike Schmidt

Mike Schmidt — Mon, 02 Nov 2009 00:12:25 +0000

The thing about the A-Rod double is simple. The umps made up a ground rule that anything that hits a camera is a home run. Their reasoning behind it is that they do not control what the cameraman does with the camera. That reasoning is a lie. They do control what the camerman does with the camera, they are moving him back for game 4 and they also control what the cameraman does with the camera by having instant replay. Instant replay can check to see where the camerman is, the umps don’t need to make up a ground rule about cameras. That ground rule that the umps made up is inconsistent with having instant replay. And they used the instant replay to uphold a bogus rule that should only be in effect when they do not have instant replay. That is why the call is bogus.

By: Stuart

Stuart — Sun, 01 Nov 2009 23:46:05 +0000

How would that make me insecure? If I think that our cheering helps the players that makes me insecure? Do you understand what it means to be insecure. I think you are the one that is insecure. You need to make yourself feel good by trying to talk smack on a blog. Not only are you talking smack on a blog, but youre talking smack on a blog that isnt even for your team. That just makes me think that you are insecure and your fans probably pushed you away from their blog because you lack knowledge of baseball.

By: Hugh Stacks

Hugh Stacks — Sun, 01 Nov 2009 23:29:34 +0000

Highlighting a single spelling error and not responding with anything of substance…guess my assertation was pretty close? Once again, I have no problem with cheering, it’s part of being a fan; but if you believe that the cheering has some sort of significant impact would be a sad statement of insecurity.

By: Stuart

Stuart — Sun, 01 Nov 2009 22:58:09 +0000

Yeah nice spelling Hugh Stacks. I can see you are lacking this educational background you speak of. And if the cheering does not do anything for the players, then why cheer? We should all just sit there silent and watch and let the players work.

By: Scooter

Scooter — Sun, 01 Nov 2009 21:53:02 +0000

Hugh Stacks: its spelled CHARACTER