Opinion

Phillies need to quickly correct the Carlos Santana mistake



Carlos Santana became a polarizing figure in his first season in Philadelphia. (Arturo Pardavila III/Wikimedia Commons)

In December 2017, Philadelphia Phillies general manager Matt Klentak signed first baseman Carlos Santana as a free agent. The Phillies GM gave Santana a guaranteed three-year, $60 million deal that would take him from his age 32 through age 34 seasons.

The move was unnecessary right from the start. The Phillies already appeared set with Rhys Hoskins entering his age 25 season at the first base position.

Hoskins had belted 18 homers and drove in 48 runs with a .396 on-base percentage and .618 slugging percentage over just 50 games during his outstanding 2017 rookie campaign.

He is never going to be a Gold Glover anywhere he plays, and so first base is easily the best place for Hoskins. Over parts of four minor league seasons he appeared in a grand total of four games in left field, all just prior to his 2017 promotion.

Hoskins cannot become a free agent until after the 2023 season, so the Phillies should have been set at first base for at least the next half-dozen years.

Santana would produce a season in which he was second on the Phillies to Hoskins in both home runs (24) and RBI (86), which are roughly his career-average levels. However, he also hit for a pitiful .229 batting average.

Trying to squeeze some offense out of his lineup, Klentak reached for Santana. It didn’t work. The Phillies were one of baseball’s statistically worst offensive teams all year long.

And in making the move, Klentak also hurt the team defense by moving Hoskins out in left field. The Phillies overall defense was also one of baseball’s worst this past season.

First base was and remains the best position for Santana. Over eight big league seasons he had been a catcher and first baseman. The former was when he was a young player, the latter in recent years. He played just 26 games at third base, all when in his prime at age 28 in the 2014 season.

Down the stretch, with the season already lost thanks to a Phillies collapse over the final seven weeks, the team seemed to admit its mistake. Hoskins was returned to first base, playing there in 11 of the final 17 games and six of the last seven.

Meanwhile, Santana was moved across the infield to the hot corner. He appeared in 18 of the last 27 games there. Regular third baseman Maikel Franco had begun experiencing pain in his wrist, then suffered a shoulder injury while diving into a camera well during a September 11 doubleheader. Franco would play in just nine September games.

Through a late-August road trip prior to the onset of his physical troubles, Franco was arguably having a better season than Santana. He was hitting for a .276 average with 22 homers and 66 RBI in 119 games, a pace that would have seen him finish with roughly 30 homers and 90 RBI. He is certainly a better defensive third baseman.

The Phillies should again be set at both corners. Hoskins is apparently back as the regular first baseman. As our Tim Kelly reported here at Phillies Nation two weeks ago, the Phillies sound committed to Hoskins playing first base in 2019. Across the diamond, Franco is clearly the better option. He also cannot become a free agent until after the 2021 season.

Now as the Phillies begin preparations for 2019, it is time to recognize fully the Santana mistake, and turn the page from the player who will turn 33-years-old early next season. The worst thing that the club could do is enter spring training with any ambiguity involving two key young players.

There are two ways to handle the Santana situation. Either is fine with me. First and best, trade him to another team for something of value. You aren’t going to get much for an aging, limited player making $40 million over the next two years. But maybe if you take on most or all of that contract you can get something decent.

While this is plan 1-A in getting rid of Santana, an acceptable alternative would be simply letting him go to any team willing to take on all or most of the contract. That seems a long shot at best.

Perhaps the Minnesota Twins, where franchise icon Joe Mauer may have played his final game. Maybe the Seattle Mariners would feel Santana’s on-base ability would upgrade them enough to push through in the American League Wildcard picture.

The second option is the toughest pill to swallow. However, when you make a mistake the best thing to do is fix it and move on. If the Phillies cannot find a taker for Santana by December, I would release him and just eat the $40 million.

That’s easy for me to say, since it’s not my money. But it would also be the right thing to do. The Santana signing was a mistake from the get-go. Admit you made that mistake and move on. The Phillies will be better for it in the next two seasons and beyond.

MORE FROM PHILLIES NATION:

9 Comments

9 Comments

  1. Fat Ted

    October 15, 2018 at 10:12 pm

    There is almost no chance the Phillies will release Santana. That’s so crazy to even write. What’s the market like for trade offers? Who else, similar to him, is going to be available either as a trade or free agent? Is he open to a bench role if can’t be traded?

    • Matthew Veasey

      October 16, 2018 at 12:17 pm

      Thanks for your input, Ted. While I obviously disagree on your view that trading Santana is “crazy” to write, I do believe it would be difficult to accomplish without simply giving him away. As I wrote in the piece, that is actually something that I’m in favor of, should it come to that. Paying $40 mill the next two years for a guy to fill a “bench role” is rough. But if he is definitely okay with it, and they just cannot unload him, that’s fine with me.

    • Phillyroni

      October 16, 2018 at 7:15 pm

      Agree,,
      Why even write something that dumb.
      They ain’t eating 40 mill while (hopefully) spending 200 per on Harper and Machado.
      After accomplishing that feat,,I ,, would trade NUMEROUS assets for Trout.
      (If Angels can’t sign him long term they SHOULD be looking for a huge haul $)
      Santana,, Herrera,, Hernandez,, Alther,,Crawford,,
      And any minor leaguers not named Sixto.
      Imagine that team.

  2. tdk

    October 16, 2018 at 3:36 pm

    The other option is to put him on the bench and use him as a pinch hitter. It seems to me that would be preferable to “eating” the 40 million. Although I would certainly willing to pay a large part of it in order to trade him away.

    But I definitely agree with the main point that the Phillies are better off without Santana in the starting lineup.

    • Matthew Veasey

      October 16, 2018 at 6:26 pm

      If he is absolutely okay knowing that he is going to be purely a pinch-hitter who gets the occasional start for Hoskins against a tough righty, then I’m fine with that – assuming they can’t get anything in a deal. However, having him sit around on the bench and in the dugout unhappy? That is something they cannot allow.

  3. Craig Glessner

    October 16, 2018 at 4:13 pm

    We have to trade Santana and Hernandez because if we don’t Kapler will keep putting them in the lineup. Maybe if we can’t trade them then it will be cheaper to get rid of Kapler and the next coach realizes that Santana and Hernandez are role players not starters at least not in Philly. Maybe we can trade all 3 to Miami for $250 thousand in international money that should push back their rebuild by a couple of years by unleashing that combo on South Florida. Why do I keep reading that the Yankees are going to be in on every free agent this year and Goldschmidt it is time the Phillies front office makes smart personnel decisions and spends some moldy money. We need 2 good signings and at least 2 good subtractions this off season. I like the article it makes sense that is something lacking in Philly lately. MAKE the PHILLIES GREAT AGAIN in 2019

  4. Mark Angel Nieves

    October 16, 2018 at 5:54 pm

    i would be a bit leery to give up on 20 plus homers 90 rbis and 110 walks. true the ba is low, however, a switch from one league to another will often impact a player. i would take an wait and see approch.

    • Matthew Veasey

      October 16, 2018 at 6:24 pm

      I look at his career averages and wonder why they ever gave him $60 million. And hard to figure why we should believe anything will improve in his ages 33-34 seasons. To me, “wait and see” is the antithesis of “Be Bold”, their presumed motto. We shall see.

  5. ray

    October 17, 2018 at 3:02 am

    Phillies knew that Hoskins couldn’t play left field after seeing him there in the 2017 season when they kept him in left because they didn’t want to hurt Tommy Joseph’s feelings by putting Hoskins on first base and sitting Joseph. Therefore only place for Hoskins in 2018 should have been 1st base. Dummies in management over pay for Santana to play a position that should have been played by Hoskins. I agree with you, they need to admit mistake sit or trade Santana and put best team on field Hoskins at first, Franco at third.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Phillies Nation has been bringing Phillies fans together since 2004 with non-stop news, analysis, trade rumors, trips, t-shirts, and other fun stuff!

Browse the Archives

Browse by Category

Copyright Phillies Nation, LLC 2004-2018
Not Affiliated with Major League Baseball or the Philadelphia Phillies

To Top